
NexTitan vs.
Tomax AST
per unit, stackable.
<10 ms response, downhole
¹ NexTitan ROP, force and response-time figures are from GA Drilling deployment tests happening in Norway in 2026. Test summary available on request via the form below.
² Tomax AST specifications (hole size, temperature rating, length, ultimate tensile load, make-up torque, operating principle) are taken from Tomax AS published product documentation, retrieved in August 2026. GA Drilling has not independently tested Tomax AST.
Tomax AST is a trademark of Tomax AS, Stavanger, Norway. GA Drilling is not affiliated with Tomax AS. The two tools operate on different principles and this comparison is intended to help drilling engineers evaluate which approach suits their application.

Utilize different electronic modes
Set target rate of penetration (ROP), weight on bit (WOB), constant torque, differential pressure, and more based on the formation you’re drilling in.
Optimize drilling costs and performance
Every time NexTitan goes downhole, its sensors feed data to Advansa AI. The tool learns from each run, so performance repeats across a basin and improves the more you drill.
Drill further in a single run
String friction limits WOB delivery in long deviated sections. NexTitan applies weight at the bit directly, so you can drill longer laterals and access more resources.
Avoid getting stuck downhole
NexTitan has two mechanical retraction elements that don't require electronics or surface commands to execute. Depending on the failure mode, you either continue drilling with reduced capacity or execute a controlled trip.




